Sunday, 12 October 2008

Raúl Castro’s big gamble

He is betting that he can improve living standards while also keeping the lid on political dissent.
By Jorge G. Castañeda NEWSWEEK
From the magazine issue dated May 5, 2008

As predicted by many observers of the Cuban scene, including Brian Latell, author of "After Fidel," and this writer, the island's new president, Raúl Castro, has hit the ground running—sort of. During his first weeks in office, though not necessarily in power, he has either implemented or announced important changes in the everyday lives of ordinary Cubans, while simultaneously retaining, and even strengthening, the limitations on political dissent. For instance, he cracked down on a demonstration in Havana last week of the Damas de Blanco, the spouses of the 75 political prisoners arrested in 2003.

This suggests Raúl is applying the so-called Vietnamese solution: initiating promising economic reforms without offering an inkling of political change. It is also similar to what Mexicans back in the 1990s called perestroika without glasnost, when their country experienced significant economic changes under President Carlos Salinas but continued to face the same one-party political system that had ruled since the 1920s. Raúl Castro is allowing Cubans, for the first time, to own cell phones, DVDs and computers (so long as they're not connected to the Internet), as well as access to hotels previously restricted to foreign tourists. Perhaps he will soon also allow them to leave the country without exit permits. True, it is something of an exaggeration to compare this even to Mexico's modest political liberalization of the '90s. Cuba's reforms hardly represent a major opening of the island's society, and scarcely resemble the type of transformations Mikhail Gorbachev initiated in the former Soviet Union. In fact, many argue that Raúl's reforms are merely cosmetic, because they are limited to "exotic" consumer goods, and because the typical Cuban on the street lacks the resources to take advantage of them.

Nonetheless, the reforms should not be dismissed out of hand. No one really knows how much convertible currency average Cubans have stashed away under their mattresses, whether in dollars, euros or CUCs (freely exchangeable Cuban pesos, which are different from regular pesos). The long queues of people lining up to purchase cell phones on the first days the stores opened suggest that there may be far more money circulating in the island's underground economy than many, including the authorities, may have imagined. Whether this money comes from tips earned in the tourism industry, gifts brought or sent from Miami to family members on the island outside traceable channels or through Cubans moonlighting for foreign residents as drivers, housekeepers or other older but less respected professions in exchange for hard currency, Cubans' pent-up demands for these types of consumer goodies could well surpass expectations, as well as the authorities' capacity to satisfy or manage them.

Authorities may also struggle with the consequences of loosening restrictions on travel abroad. Cubans today need a "white card" to leave, as well as an invitation from a foreign country, together with an entry visa to that foreign country (if that other state requires it). Eliminating the first two requirements—even if the reform didn't apply to doctors, teachers, people who have not completed their military service or who serve in the armed forces or the security apparatus—could unleash an exodus like those Cuba experienced in the '60s, '80s and '90s, or that took place in Eastern Europe in 1989. Already Cubans are leaving their country at a breakneck pace: 15,000 of them, without papers, left for Mexico last year, and the number traveling one way or another to the United States, Spain, the Dominican Republic and Central America is growing. Opening up the floodgates could unleash a whole new wave of emigrants, leaving the country without many of its best minds, and with many frustrated Cubans left behind.

Therein lies the danger of the younger Castro's gamble. He is betting he can more or less at the same time satisfy Cuban citizens with these gestures, improve their living standards somewhat by freeing up agricultural production and allowing wages to rise in the "foreign" sector of the economy, while keeping the lid on political dissent, exile and a slew of imponderables, including, crucially, Hugo Chávez and his increasingly precarious position in Venezuela. All of Castro's plans would be dashed if Cuba were forced to suddenly start importing the roughly 80,000 barrels of oil per day it consumes at a market price of $118 per barrel, without Caracas's subsidies. But the Venezuelan president's fate is not in Havana's hands. Nor can Havana prevent Cubans from using their new cell phones to conspire against the regime, or set up makeshift Internet connections to communicate with the world. Foreign travel will lead many Cubans to finally understand how dramatically they have been deceived by their government.

Either Raúl shares his brother's luck and immense political acumen or he's so worried about the current situation that he feels the risk of fiddling with it and losing control is smaller than that of doing nothing. He may well lose control regardless, however—particularly if the rest of the world is willing to help in the right ways, namely by removing sanctions and embargos that have only kept the authoritarian regime in place, but demanding that any Cuban return to the Latin American concert implies playing by its rules: free elections, free media, free labor unions and respect for human rights.

Castañeda is a former foreign minister of Mexico and Global Distinguished Professor at New York University.

Sunday, 9 March 2008

Latin America's new proxy war.


Washington has gone all-out to stop Chávez from winning [a Security Council seat]. He's been personally campaigning for months.

By Jorge G. Castañeda
Newsweek International

The summit of non-aligned countries held last week in Havana was an occasion for all sorts of things: speculating on Fidel Castro's health, supporting all the "worthwhile" causes in the world —from Iran's nuclear program to Bolivia's stalled natural-gas nationalization — and predictably, bashing George W. Bush. This last contact sport is beginning to give traditional anti-Americanism a bad name; it is vicious, uninterrupted and, unfortunately, not often easy to rebut. But the summit also provided a marvelous opportunity for one of the stars of the show—Venezuela's Hugo Chávez—to lobby strong and hard for his cause of the day, getting his country elected as one of Latin America's two nonpermanent members of the United Nations Security Council for the 2007-08 term.

The Non-Aligned Movement has well over 100 members; all of them vote in the U.N. General Assembly, which, sometime next month, will elect Argentina's replacement as one of Latin America's two representatives on the Council. Chávez wants the seat badly. Next year there is another dramatic battle shaping up: Turkey, Iceland and Austria will compete for two of the three European slots. But the main event this year is the contest between Venezuela and Guatemala for the Latin American post. This is, in fact, a proxy battle between Bush and Chávez. Washington has gone all-out to stop Chávez from winning. The Venezuelan has been personally campaigning for months all over the globe, doling out petrodollars, oil and gas projects, schools and hospitals as he jets from capital to capital in Africa, Asia and his home region.

A two-thirds majority is needed to win; that's 128 votes to triumph, or votes to defeat one's rival. The voting goes on until a candidate reaches the magic number; there is an unwritten rule that after three rounds, previous commitments are withdrawn and everything goes. Actually, everything goes most of the time: promises are broken, votes are bought and sold and betrayal is ever-present. All of this occurs, of course, because the stakes are high, and higher in Latin America than at any time since 1979, when Fidel Castro attempted to win the regional seat, claiming that Cuba, being chairman then—as now—of the Non-Aligned Movement, was entitled to membership. The United States blocked Castro, using Colombia as a stalking horse, and Mexico was elected as a compromise candidate. This time, things might be more complicated.

He would use that magnificent pulpit to glorify his Bolivarian Revolution.
The risk for the United States is real. Chávez would probably occupy the seat personally for extended periods at a time, in lieu of his permanent representative or his foreign minister. He would use that magnificent pulpit to glorify his Bolivarian Revolution, to help his friends in 50Latin America and to thwart his enemies—Bush, incoming president Felipe Calderón in Mexico, and Colombian President Alvaro Uribe. Most significant, he would get directly involved in many of the issues the Security Council will have to address in the next two years, including sanctions against Iran. No wonder Washington and other capitals are terrified at the prospect.

But it is not clear that there is much they can do about it. Guatemala claims it has 90 committed votes. Attrition—a euphemism for promises unkept—and Chávez's oil-fueled largesse mean that number is likely to shrink. The only chance to keep Chávez out of Dag Hammarskjold Plaza is to lock in a blocking third of the votes indefinitely, and hope that, like 37 years ago, the Latin American group will seek a compromise.

It won't be easy: Cuba, Brazil and Argentina all support Venezuela. Even Chile probably will, and the only major countries behind Guatemala are Mexico and Colombia. Chávez has not helped himself by wondering out loud in Havana whether Mexico's elections were free and fair, and whether he will recognize Calderon's victory. The question is, though, if anyone else in the region wants 72to face his wrath and meddling by finding a way out of the quagmire. Right now only Uruguay and the Dominican Republic qualify as acceptable alternatives; but the last thing Presidents Leonel Fernández or Tabaré Vázquez probably want is to mess with Hugo.

So, the betting right now is on Venezuela, and against Washington. It would be an uphill fight for the United States under any circumstances, but it's almost an impossible one given George Bush's unpopularity in what was once known as the Third World. Most of its members just met in Havana, and they don't like 43; they don't like Israel, they don't like Tony Blair and they certainly don't like U.S. policy in Iraq and Iran. U.S.

Abbreviations



A:

AAP:  Africa Action Plan.

ABAC:  APEC Business Advisory Council.

ABL:  Airborne Laser.

ABM:  Anti-Ballistic Missile Treaty.

ACD:  Asia Cooperation Dialogue.

ACP:  Africa, Caribbean and Pacific Group.

ACSA: Acquisition and Cross-Servicing Agreement.

AD:  Antidumping.

ADB:  Asian Development Bank.

AE:  Associate Expert.

AEC:  ASEAN Economic Community.

AFTA:  ASEAN Free Trade Area.

AG:  Australia Group.

ANBP:  Aphganistan’s new beginnings Programme.

APEC:  Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation.

ARF:  ASEAN Regional Forum.

ASC:  ASEAN Security Community.

ASCC:   ASEAN Socio-cultural Community.

ASEAN:  Association of Southeast Asian Nations.

ASEAN+3:   ASEAN plus Japan, China and the Republic of Korea.

ASEM:  Asia-Europe Meeting.

ASTOP:  Asian Senior-level Talks on Non-Proliferation.

AU:  African Union.


B:

BDRT:  Business Dialogue Round Table.

BEGIN:  Basic Education for Growth Initiative.

BIMP-EAGA:  Brunei-Indonesia-Malaysia-Philippines East ASEAN Growth Area.

BMD:  Ballistic Missile Defense.

BSE:  Bovine Spongiform Encephalopathy.

BWC:  Biological Weapons Convention.

C.

CAFTA:  Central American Free Trade Agreement.

CAP:  Collective Action Plan.

CARICOM:  Caribbean Community.

CBRN:  Chemical, Biological, Radiological and Nuclear.

CCW:   Convention on Conventional Weapons.

CD:  Conference on Disarmament.

CDM:  Clean Development Mechanism.

CE:  Council of Europe.

CEA:   Council of Economic Advisers.

CEPA:   Closer Economic Partnership Arrangement.

CFSP:  Common Foreign and Security Policy.

CG:   Consultative group.

CIA:   Central Intelligence Agency.

CICP:  Centre for International Crime Prevention.

CIS:   Commonwealth of Independent States.

CNRT:  National Council of Timorese Resistance.

COP:  Conference of the Parties.

COP9:  Ninth Session of the Conference of the Parties.

CPA:  Coalition Provisional Authority.

CSCAP: Council for Security Cooperation in the Asia Pacific.

CTAG: Counter-Terrorism Action Group.

CTBT: Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban Treaty.

CTC: Counter-Terrorism Committee.

CTTF: Counter Terrorism Task Force.

CWC: Chemical Weapons Convention.

D.

DAC: Development Assistance Committee.

DDR: Disarmament, Demobilization and Reintegration of ex-combatants.

DDRR: Disarmament, Demobilization, Rehabilitation and Reintegration.

DDT: Dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane.

DOMREP: Mission of the Representative of the Secretary-General in the Dominican Republic.

DSU: Dispute settlement understanding.

E:

EAC: East African Community.

EASG: East Asia Study Group.

EBRD: European Bank for Reconstruction and Development.

EC: European Community.

ECA: Economic Commission for Africa.

ECB: European Central Bank.

EcoISD: Environmental Conservation Initiative for Sustainable Development.

ECOWAS: Economic Community of West African States.

EEA: European Economic Area.

EFTA: European Free Trade Association.

EFTA: European Free Trade Association.

EMU: Economic and Monetary Union.

EMU: European Monetary Union.

EPA: Economic Partnership Agreement.

ESCAP: Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific.

ESDP: European Security and Defense Policy.

ETTA: East Timor Transitional Administration.

EU: European Union.

EVSL: Early Voluntary Sectoral Liberalization.

F:

F/S: Feasibility Study.

FAO: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.

FARC: Revolutionary Armed Forces of Colombia.

FASID: Foundation for Advanced Studies on International Development.

FATF: Financial Action Task Force.

FBI: Federal Bureau of Investigation.

FEALAC: Forum for East Asia-Latin America Cooperation.

FGM: Female Genital Mutilation.

FNL: National Liberation Forces.

FOMC: Federal Open Market Committee.

FRB: Federal Reserve Board.

FTA: Free Trade Agreement.

FTAA: Free Trade Area of the Americas.

G.

G7: Group of Seven.

G8: Group of Eight.

GAM: Free Aceh Movement.

GATT: General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade.

GCA: Global Coalition for Africa.

GDP: Gross Domestic Product.

GFATM: Global Fund to Fight AIDS, Tuberculosis and Malaria.

GII: Global Issues Initiative on Population and AIDS.

GNP: Gross National Product.

H:

HCOC: Hague Code of Conduct against Ballistic Missile Proliferation.

HIPCs: Heavily Indebted Poor Countries.

HIV/AIDS: Human Immunodeficiency Virus/Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome.

HSBC: The Hongkong and Shanghai Banking Corporation Limited.

I:

IAEA: International Atomic Energy Agency.

IAI: Initiative for ASEAN Integration.

IAP: Individual Action Plan.

ICAO: International Civil Aviation Organization.

ICC: International Criminal Court.

ICJ: International Court of Justice.

ICOC: International Code of Conduct against Ballistic Missile Proliferation.

ICPO: International Criminal Police Organization.

ICRC: International Committee of the Red Cross.

ICT: Information and Communications Technology.

IDA: International Development Association.

IDEA: Initiative for Development in East Asia.

IDI: Okinawa Infectious Diseases Initiative.

IEA: International Energy Agency.

IEF: International Energy Forum.

IGAD: Inter-Governmental Authority on Development.

IGC: Inter-Governmental Conference.

IGS: Information Gathering Satellite.

IHO: International Hydrographic Organization.

ILO: International Labour Organization.

IMF: International Monetary Fund. .

IMN: Iraqi Media Network.

IMO: International Maritime Organization.

IMS: International Monitoring System.

IODP: Integrated Ocean Drilling Program.

IOM: International Organization for Migration.

ISAF: International Security Assistance Force.

ISS: International Space Station.

ISTC: International Science and Technology Center.

IT: Information Technology.

ITER: International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor.

ITLOS: International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea.

ITU: International Telecommunication Union.

IUU: illegal, unreported and unregulated.

IWC: International Whaling Commission.

J:

JBIC: Japan Bank for International Cooperation.

JET: Japan Exchange and Teaching Programme.

JETRO: Japan External Trade Organization.

JI: Jamaah Islamiya.

JICA: Japan International Cooperation Agency.

JPF: Japan Platform.

JPO: Junior Professional Officer.

JSEPA: Japan-Singapore Economic Partnership Agreement.

JTPP2: Japan-Thailand Partnership Programme in Technical Cooperation Phase 2.

K:

KDP: Kurdistan Democratic Party.

KEDO: Korean Peninsula Energy Development Organization.

KFOR: Kosovo Force.

KR: Khmer Rouge.

L:

LAN: Local area network.

LDC: Least developed countries.

LTTE: Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam.

M:

M&A: merger and acquisition.

MAD: Mutually Assured Destruction.

MANPADS: Man Portable Air Defense System.

MAP: Membership Action Plan.

MD: missile defense.

MDGs: Millennium Development Goals.

MILF: Moro Islamic Liberation Front.

MINUGUA: United Nations Verification Mission in Guatemala.

MINURCA: United Nations Mission in the Central African Republic.

MINURSO: United Nations Mission for the Referendum in Western Sahara.

MIPONUH: United Nations Civilian Police Mission in Haiti.

MNLF: Moro National Liberation Front.

MONUA: United Nations Observer Mission in Angola.

MONUC: United Nations Organization Mission in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

MRA: Mutual Recognition Agreement.

MTCR: Missile Technology Control Regime.

N:

NAFTA: North American Free Trade Agreement.

NATO: North Atlantic Treaty Organization.

NEACD: Northeast Asia Cooperation Dialogue.

NEPAD: New Partnership for Africa’s Development.

NERICA: New Rice for Africa.

NGO: non-governmental organization.

NIH: National Institutes of Health.

NIOC: National Iranian Oil Company.

NIRA: National Institute for Research Advancement.

NIS: New Independent States.

NLD: National League for Democracy.

NPT: Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty.

NRC: NATO-Russia Council.

NRF: NATO Response Force.

NSF: National Science Foundation.

NSG: Nuclear Suppliers Group.

O:

OAA: Osaka Action Agenda.

OAS: Organization of American States.

OAU: Organization of African Unity.

ODA: Official Development Assistance.

OECD: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.

OIC: Organization of the Islamic Conference.

OIE: Office International des Epizootoes.

ONUC: United Nations Operation in the Congo.

ONUCA: United Nations Observer Group in Central America.

ONUMOZ: United Nations Operation in Mozambique.

ONUSAL: United Nations Observer Mission in El Salvador.

OPCW: Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons.

OPEC: Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries.

ORHA: Office of Reconstruction and Humanitarian Assistance.

OSCE: Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe.

OSI: on-site inspection.

P:

PCB: polychlorinated biphenyl.

PCC: Prague Capabilities Commitment.

PECC: Pacific Economic Cooperation Council.

PIF: Pacific Islands Forum.

PKF: Peacekeeping Forces.

PKO: Peacekeeping Operations.

PLO: Palestine Liberation Organization.

PM: Politico-Military.

PMC: ASEAN Post-Ministerial Conference.

POPs: persistent organic pollutants.

PP: Political Party.

PRT: Provincial Reconstruction Teams.

PSI: Proliferation Security Initiative.

PSOE: Partido Socialista Obrero Español.

PUK: Patriotic Union of Kurdistan.

R:

RAMSI: Regional Assistance Mission to Solomon Islands.

RISDP: Regional Indicative Strategic Development Plan.

S:

S&D: special and differential treatment.

SAARC: South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation.

SACO: Special Action Committee on Okinawa.

SADC: Southern African Development Community.

SAPTA: Agreement on SAARC Preferential Trading Arrangement.

SARS: Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome.

SCC: Japan-US Security Consultative Committee.

SCIRI: Supreme Council for Islamic Revolution in Iraq.

SEC: Securities and Exchange Commission.

SHAPE: Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe.

SLORC: State Law and Order Restoration Council.

SPD: Sozialdemokratische Partei Deutschlands.

SPDC: State Peace and Development Council.

SPLM: Sudan People’s Liberation Movement.

SSC: Security Sub-Committee.

START: Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty.

T:

TAC: Treaty of Amity and Cooperation.

TCOG: Trilateral Coordination and Oversight Group.

TICAD III: Third Tokyo International Conference on African Development.

TICAD: Tokyo International Conference on African Development.

TMD: Theater Missile Defense.

TNC: Trade Negotiations Committee.

TPRM: Trade Policy Review Mechanism.

TRIPS: Agreement on Trade-Related Aspects of Intellectual Property Rights.

U:

UN: United Nations.

UNAMA: United Nations Assistance Mission for Afghanistan.

UNAMET: United Nations Mission in East Timor.

UNAMI: United Nations Assistance Mission for Iraq.

UNAMIC: United Nations Advance Mission in Cambodia.

UNAMIR: United Nations Assistance Mission for Rwanda.

UNAMSIL: United Nations Mission in Sierra Leone.

UNASOG: United Nations Aouzou Strip Observer Group.

UNAVEM I: United Nations Angola Verification Mission I.

UNAVEM II: United Nations Angola Verification Mission II.

UNAVEM III: United Nations Angola Verification Mission III.

UNCITRAL: United Nations Commission on International Trade Law.

UNCPSG: United Nations Civilian Police Support Group in Eastern Slovenia.

UNCRD: United Nations Centre for Regional Development.

UNCRO: United Nations Confidence Restoration Operation in Croatia.

UNCTAD: United Nations Conference on Trade and Development.

UNDCP: United Nations International Drug Control Programme.

UNDOF: United Nations Disengagement Observer Force.

UNDP: United Nations Development Programme.

UNEF I: First United Nations Emergency Force.

UNEF II: Second United Nations Emergency Force.

UNEP: United Nations Environment Programme.

UNESCO: United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization.

UNFICYP: United Nations Peacekeeping Force in Cyprus.

UNFPA: United Nations Fund for Population Activities.

UNGOMAP: United Nations Good Offices Mission in Afghanistan and Pakistan.

UN-HABITAT: United Nations Human Settlements Programme.

UNHCHR: United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights.

UNHCR: United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees.

UNICEF: United Nations Children’s Fund.

UNIDO: United Nations Industrial Development Organization.

UNIFIL: United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon.

UNIIMOG: United Nations Iran-Iraq Military Observer Group.

UNIKOM: United Nations Iraq-Kuwait Observation Mission.

UNIPOM: United Nations India-Pakistan Observation Mission.

UNMEE: United Nations Mission in Ethiopia and Eritrea.

UNMIBH: United Nations Mission in Bosnia and Herzegovina.

UNMIH: United Nations Mission in Haiti.

UNMIK: United Nations Interim Administration Mission in Kosovo.

UNMIL: United Nations Mission in Liberia.

UNMISET: United Nations Mission of Support in East Timor.

UNMOGIP: United Nations Military Observer Group in India and Pakistan.

UNMOP: United Nations Mission of Observers in Prevlaka.

UNMOT: United Nations Mission of Observers in Tajikistan.

UNMOVIC: United Nations Monitoring, Verification and Inspection Commission.

UNODC: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.

UNOGIL: United Nations Observation Group in Lebanon.

UNOMIG: United Nations Observer Mission in Georgia.

UNOMIL: United Nations Observer Mission in Liberia.

UNOMSIL: United Nations Observer Mission in Sierra Leone.

UNOMUR: United Nations Observer Mission Uganda-Rwanda.

UNOSOM II: United Nations Operation in Somalia II.

UNOSOM: United Nations Operation in Somalia.

UNPREDEP: United Nations Preventive Deployment Force.

UNPROFOR: United Nations Protection Force.

UNRWA: United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Near East.

UNSCOM: United Nations Special Commission.

UNSF: United Nations Security Force in West New Guinea (West Irian).

UNSMIH: United Nations Support Mission in Haiti.

UNTAC: United Nations Transitional Authority in Cambodia.

UNTAES: United Nations Transitional Administration for Eastern Slavonia, Baranja and Western Sirmium.

UNTAET: United Nations Transitional Administration in East Timor.

UNTAG: United Nations Transition Assistance Group.

UNTMIH: United Nations Transition Mission in Haiti.

UNTSO: United Nations Truce Supervision Organization.

UNU: United Nations University.

UNYOM: United Nations Yemen Observation Mission.

V:

VJC: Visit Japan Campaign.

W:

WA: Wassenaar Arrangement.

WAN: wide area network.

WEHAB: Water, Energy, Health, Agriculture and Biodiversity.

WEU: Western European Union.

WFP: World Food Programme.

WHO: World Health Organization.

WIPO: World Intellectual Property Organization.

WSIS: World Summit on the Information Society.

WSSD: World Summit on Sustainable Development.

WTO: World Trade Organization.

Thursday, 27 December 2007

Globalization

"The greatest challenge we face today is to ensure that Globalization becomes a positive force for all the world's people, instead of leaving billions of them behind in squalor. Inclusive Globalization must be built on the great enabling force of the market, but market forces alone will not achieve it. It requires a broader effort to create a shared future, based upon our common humanity in all its diversity."

From the Millennium Report.


The backlash to Globalization.


Clearly, not everyone is happy about globalization. Many people don't like globalization because it allows rich and powerful outside business interests to intrude into a local culture, overrides local traditions, and threatens a way of life. There were many who cheered for a French farmer who vandalized a McDonald's. Starbucks coffee shops have been favorite targets for people protesting globalization.


In more traditional societies, globalization threatens the cultural and religious underpinnings of society. In both industrialized and developing countries, many people feel threatened—and are threatened—by the globalization process. A globalized economy presents a myriad of challenges, from protecting local cultures to protecting the environment to protecting local jobs.


The backlash is very real. During the failed World Trade Organization talks in Seattle that were intended to further expand trading opportunities last December, thousands of demonstrators who agree on little else aside from a common dislike for globalization, caused major disruptions.

Labor Unions protested, fearing that a new trade agreement would provide an incentive for companies to move their jobs abroad. Environmentalists protested, fearing that global trade agreements would undercut domestic environmental safeguards. And there were nationalists, who feared that further globalization would diminish national sovereignty, and possibly lead to a loss of freedom, liberty or rights.

Whether it is viewed as an ominous juggernaut that crushes everything in its path, or whether it holds the promise of a better future, globalization is a phenomenon that is with us. Like the weather, it is, and will be, a source for endless discussion, but little can be done about it. But also like the weather, it is a force to which people can adapt.


The role and Responsibility of Corporations.


With their world-wide operations succeeding in maximizing profits, corporations have assumed extraordinary power, often far surpassing that of governments. With virtually no global rules or regulations, corporations have been able to operate with a free hand in the international marketplace, moving factories where labor costs are low and where resources are cheap.
But corporations themselves are finding out that there are limitations, even in this wild-west theatre of operations. With either a spark of conscience or a heads-up look at the bottom line, many corporations have learned that there are indeed limitations to what they can, and that there are responsibilities they must assume.
  • Some corporations have learned this the hard way. Union Carbide learned this when its chemical plant in Bhopal, India, spewed poisonous gases that killed 6,000 people. And Exxon learned this when its tanker, the Exxon Valdez, spilled 11 barrels of oil over the Gulf of Alaska, which caused the company’s sales to fall from U.S. $9.9 billion a year to US $.4.8 billion eight years later, plus an addition billion in clean-up costs.


Catastrophic incidents such as these are well-known and relatively rare. Yet there are growing networks of non-governmental organizations who have made it their business to publicize other corporate transgressions, such as poor environmental, labor, or human rights violations. To limit exposure to bad publicity which can severely limit profits, or in some cases, just to do the right thing, many companies themselves have adopted various codes of conduct in their global dealings.


To engage business and corporations in a dialogue on corporate social responsibility, the UN Secretary-General has proposed a nine-principle code of conduct for business—the Global Compact -- which is drawn from existing international agreements on the environment, human rights and worker rights. A wide range of corporations have pledged that they will adhere to these principles, some that have been extensively criticized for their past practices. One of those companies is the sneaker company Nike, which has been singled out for criticism on its labor practices in developing countries.
  • Philip Knight, the founder of Nike and its Chief Executive Officer said at a recent meeting at the UN on the Global Compact, "When we started the company that would eventually become Nike, I never dreamed that a small Oregon business selling sneakers from the trunk of an old Valiant would become a symbol of globalization. But it has."


He added, "In many ways Nike has become a fitting symbol for what is right - and what needs fixing - in an increasingly interdependent economy. We are small by multinational standards but manufacture in 50 countries. In each there are distinctly different legal, social, financial and economic systems. That means Nike, and thousands of other companies, have a monumental task: defining what our global responsibility is, and how to act on it, in many host countries."

Wednesday, 26 December 2007

Acronyms and Abbreviations

CARICOM:  Caribbean community.

CDERA:  Caribbean disaster and Emergency Response Agency.

CSME:  Caribbean single Market and Economy.

ECLAC:   Economic commission for Latin America and the Caribbean.

GEF:   Global environment facility.

GFATM:   Global Fund for AIDS, Tuberculosis, and Malaria.

ICT:    Information and communications technology.

IDB:    Inter-American Development Bank.

IMF:
        International Monetary Fund.

LAC:  Latin America and the Caribbean.

MDG:  Millennium Development Goals.

NGO:   Non-governmental organization.

OECS:    Organization of Eastern Caribbean States.

PAPEP:  Project for political analysis and Prospective Scenarios.

PANCAP:  Pan Caribbean partnership on HIV/AIDS.

PLWHA:  People living with HIV/AIDS.

PRODDAL:   Project on Development of Democracy in Latin America.

RBLAC:   Regional Bureau for Latin America and the Caribbean (UNDP).

RCF:  Regional cooperation framework.

SIGOB:  Project for Governance systems.

SURF:  Subregional resource facility.

TRIPS:  Trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights.

UN:   United Nations.

UNDAF:  United Nations Development Agreement Framework.

UNDP:  United Nations Development Programme.

UNFCCC:   United Nations framework Convention on Climate Change.

UNAIDS:   Joint United Nations Programme on HIV/AIDS.

UNIFEM:  United Nations Development Fund for Women.

Source: Evaluation of UNDP’s Second Regional Cooperation Framework of Latin America and the Caribbean, 2002–2006. United Nations Development Programme.

Monday, 19 November 2007

The Role of the United Nations Organization.

Is it doing its job right?

  The United Nations System International organization is nowadays and without any question the most influential and important worldwide organism. This is mainly due to the fact that it unites many countries in a place where everybody can be heard. The “chief executives” are the most powerful countries which run and are in charge of the decision-making department of this organization.

  Its main target is to keep peace among all the nations and we have admitted that the objectives and goals that it has achieved through the years are remarkable and it has changed the reality of many people around the world, especially the weakest and the poorest.

  But we have got to take a moment and ask ourselves the following question: Is the United Nations Organization doing its job right? It has not always achieved what it is expected from it.

  When the decision-making relies on some of the most important nation-state such as USA, France and Germany which even though, their job is to promote and defend the organization objectives (such a Justice, development, peace, etc) and protect the world’s interests, it is not always what they do. Many of the countries which take part of this organization work for themselves and for their interests of their own country, not caring for the damage and pain they could cause somewhere else, out of their boundaries.

  I perceive example of this: The war in Iraq. When the United States of America, practically, walked over the United Nations and invaded Iraq despite the decision of the U.N to “end up” terrorism. In this case, the power that the U.N was supposed to have to avoid war did not work. The rules and procedures that they were supposed to follow and stick to, were respected by some of the countries, but not by the most powerful one which thought they were not the most appropriate ones, and did what it thought was a better way: war.

 What about its main principle?

  On the other hand, what it also seems unfair to me is the power-decision big gap existing between the big countries and the developing world. We do not find equilibrium when it comes to making decisions. This violates the most important principle of international law, which says: "All countries no matter how developed, they are, they have the same rights and must be treated as equal."

  This is why the United Nations Organization needs to reform some of these articles, aiming to make its structure and its institutions in general stronger, where the decisions take place through consensus.

  Finally, it is also necessary certain mechanisms to punish those countries that do not follow the statements and rules adopted by the UN and signed up by each country. In other words, it should be tougher, specially, with those countries that do not carry out the organization's decisions.

Sunday, 18 November 2007